In a unanimous decision on November 25, 2019, the Court of Appeals vacated our client's conviction after the trial court refused to allow cross-examination of police witnesseses about prior instances of dishonesty. It was an abuse of discretion to prohibit counsel from exploring one officer's misstatements to a federal prosecutor in a different matter, as well as prior judicial determinations rejecting both officers' testimony as incredible. John Vang represented the client in the Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals.
CAL in the Courts
COA Says Cops Can Be Questioned About Prior Instances of Dishonesty